Moral Interpretation: virtue ethics and social psychology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14394/etyka.1340Keywords:
virtue ethics, moral interpretation, social psychologyAbstract
The goal of the paper is to answer the question what does the process of Moral Interpretation (MI) look like. The main point of reference is the idea of MI as proposed by De Caro and Vaccarezza (De Caro, Vaccarezza, 2020). The article critically analyses their proposition and modifies it. The modified version is based on the bottom-up approach and findings of modern social psychology and doesn’t contain aristotelian presuppositions. I will argue that MI can be explained as a process of attributing to someone moral dispositions, which is crucial to making predictions about someone’s behaviour in the future. As a consequence, MI is a fundamental part of human cognition, which is necessary to function in society.
Downloads
References
Abele, A., Wojciszke, B. 2014. Communal and Agentic Content in Social Cognition: A Dual Perspective Model, “Advances in Experimental Social Psychology”, 50, 198-255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800284-1.00004-7
Carlston, D.E., Skowronski, J.J. 1994. Savings in the re-learning of trait information as evidence for spontaneous trait generation. “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 66, 840–856 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.840
Davidson, D. 2001. Inquiries into truth and interpretation. Clarendon Press, Oxford DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199246297.001.0001
Davidson, D. 1973. Radical Interpretation. Dialectica, 27(3-4), 313–328 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.1973.tb00623.x
De Caro, M., Vaccarezza, M.S.. 2020. Morality and Interpretation: the Principle of Phronetic Charity, „Ethical Theory and Moral Practice”, 23 (3), 295-307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-019-10054-2
Cooper, J.M. 1998. The Unity of Virtue, „Social Philosophy and Policy Foundation” 15, 233–274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500003149
Navarini, C., Indracollo, A., Brunetti, R. 2021. Practical Wisdom and Generalization: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation on the Effects of Limited Information, [in:] De Caro M., Vaccarezza M. S. (ed.), Practical Wisdom. Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives, Routledge, New York, 114-137
Ross, L. 1977. The Intuitive Psychologist and His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process, “Advances in Experimental Social Psychology”, 10, 173-220 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60357-3
Szutta, N. 2017. Czy istnieje coś, co zwiemy moralnym charakterem i cnotą?, Wydawnictwo Academicon, Lublin DOI: https://doi.org/10.52097/acapress.9788362475605
Uleman, J.S., Newman, L.S., Moskowitz, G.B. 1996. People as flexible interpreters: Evidence and issues from a spontaneous trait inference, “Advances in Experimental Social Psychology”, 28, 211–279 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60239-7
Wojciszke, B. 2011. Psychologia społeczna, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Wiktoria Kąkol
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Works published in ETYKA are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0), which entails acknowledgement of authorship. Under this licence, Authors keep their copyrights and agree that their works can be used again legally for any purpose, including commercial ones, without the need to obtain previous consent of the Author or publisher. The articles can be downloaded, printed, copied and disseminated; under the condition that the authorship is indicated accordingly, together with the place of original publication. The Authors preserve their copyrights to the above-mentioned works without any limitation whatsoever.
Funding data
-
Uniwersytet Gdański
Grant numbers UGrants Start 2
