Liberalism of Martha C. Nussbaum: Between Individual Autonomy and Political Tolerance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14394/etyka.505Keywords:
liberalizm, utylitaryzm, judaizm, Arystoteles, wolność religijna, wolna wola, demokracjaAbstract
This paper describes the ambiguity of Martha C. Nussbaum’s political theory based on her development ethics known as the capabilities approach. She is eager to present herself as a political liberal and claims to offer more promising foundations of political toleration than Larmore and Rawls: her position better deals with the issues of overalpping consensus, respect and religious freedom than that of Rawls. Is it really the case? Linda Barclay argues that Nussbaum’s capabilities approach is in fact a comprehensive ethical doctrine focused on individual moral autonomy and as such cannot be considered as a form of political liberalism. Nussbaum rejects the claim and exhibits universal and pluralistic elements in her approach. In developing her account of political liberalism she engages in a criticism of comprehensive liberals, especially Mill, Berlin, and Raz.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Works published in ETYKA are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0), which entails acknowledgement of authorship. Under this licence, Authors keep their copyrights and agree that their works can be used again legally for any purpose, including commercial ones, without the need to obtain previous consent of the Author or publisher. The articles can be downloaded, printed, copied and disseminated; under the condition that the authorship is indicated accordingly, together with the place of original publication. The Authors preserve their copyrights to the above-mentioned works without any limitation whatsoever.