Animal Rights: A New Vista

Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14394/etyka.1304

Słowa kluczowe:

emocje, ewolucyjne dziedzictwo, podmiotowość, posthumanizm, prawa zwierząt, wrażliwość moralna

Abstrakt

Na dyskusję o prawach zwierząt wpłynęły w ciągu ostatnich 40 lat zmiany, zachodzące w nauce, filozofii, przyrodzie i w życiu społecznym. Należą do nich: 1. Pogłębianie wrażliwości moralnej, stopniowe obejmowanie nią istot coraz odleglejszych od bliskiego nam kręgu. 2. Zagrożenia środowiskowe i ich związki ze stosunkiem człowieka do zwierząt. 3. Odkrycia naukowe w zakresie etologii i emocjonalności zwierząt, wskazujące na ewolucyjne korzenie moralności. 4. Nowe koncepcje filozoficzne (dotyczące umysłu rozszerzonego, ucieleśnionego i zagnieżdżonego; enaktywizm, posthumanizm) i rewizja pojęcia podmiotowości. 5. Ujawnienie niejasności pojęcia prawa i jego związków z pojęciem obowiązku i potrzeby. Te obserwacje sugerują, że punkt wyjścia w dyskusjach na temat relacji między ludźmi a zwierzętami innymi niż ludzie przesunął się z tradycyjnej perspektywy ludzkiej w stronę bardziej kompleksowego podejścia, które korzysta z osiągnięć nauki i uwzględnia zagadnienia związane z ochroną środowiska.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Biogram autora

Anna Jedynak - University of Warsaw

Full Professor, works in Department of Logic at Faculty of Philosophy, University of Warsaw. Works in philosophy of science and language, pragmatical aspects of communication, and value theory.

Bibliografia

Adams, F., and K. Aizawa. 2001. “The Bounds of Cognition”. Philosophical Psychology 14, no. 1: 43–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080120033571

Bakewell, S. 2013. “Clang Went the Trolley”, New York Times, Nov. 22. Accessed May 29, 2020. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/24/books/review/would-you-kill-the-fat-man-and-the-trolley-problem.html.

Cell Press. 2019. “Researchers grow active mini-brain-networks”. ScienceDaily, June 27. Accessed June 1, 2020. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/06/190627113945.htm.

Cerasuolo, E., dir. 2013. Last Call. Turin: Zenit Arti Audiovisive and Skofteland Film. Accessed May 25, 2020. www.lastcallthefilm.org.

Changeux, J.-P., A.R. Damasio, W. Singer, and Y. Christen, eds. 2005. Neurobiology of Human Values. Berlin: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29803-7

Clark, A., and D. Chalmers. 1998. “The Extended Mind”. Analysis 58, no. 1: 7–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8284.00096

Damasio, A.R. 2005. “The Neurobiological Grounding of Human Values”. In Neurobiology of Human Values, ed. J.-P. Changeux et al., 47–56. Berlin: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29803-7_5

de Waal, F. 2006. Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved. Ed. S. Macedo, J. Obers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400830336

de Waal, F. 2010. The Age of Empathy: Nature’s Lessons for a Kinder Society. London: Crown Publishing Group.

Eisen, M.B., and P.O. Brown. 2022. “Rapid Global Phaseout of Animal Agriculture Has the Potential to Stabilize Greenhouse Gas Levels for 30 Years and Offset 68 Percent of CO2 Emissions This Century.” PLOS Climate 1 (2): e0000010. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000010

Ferrando, F. 2013. “Posthumanism, transhumanism, antihumanism, metahumanism, and new materialisms: differences and relations”. Existenz 8, no. 2: 26–32.

Greene, J. 2005. “Emotion and Cognition in Moral Judgment: Evidence from Neuroimaging”. In Neurobiology of Human Values, ed. J.-P. Changeux et al., 57–66. Berlin: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29803-7_6

Haidt, J. 2001. “The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment”. Psychological Review 108, no. 4: 814–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.108.4.814

Haraway, D. 1991. “A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century”. In idem, Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, 149–81. New York: Routledge.

Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.

Kołakowski, L. 2008. “Why Do We Need Human Rights?”, trans. T. Wolański. In 60 Years of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Anniversary Book Vol. 3, Human Rights: An Anthology of Texts, ed. J. Zajadło, 718–30. Warsaw: The Office of the Commissioner for Civil Rights Protection.

Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.

Logan, R.K. 2007. The Extended Mind: The Emergence of Language, the Human Mind and Culture, Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442684911

Meadows, D.H., D.L. Meadows, J. Randers, and W.W. Behrens III. 1972. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1349/ddlp.1

Melina, V., W. Craig, and S. Levin. 2016. “Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Vegetarian Diets.” Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics 116 (12): 1970–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2016.09.025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2016.09.025

Menary, R. 2010. “Cognitive Integration and the Extended Mind”. In idem, ed., The Extended Mind, 227–43. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8535.003.0010

Miner, K.R., J. D’Andrilli, R. Mackelprang, A. Edwards, M.J. Malaska, M.P. Waldrop, and C.E. Miller. 2021. “Emergent Biogeochemical Risks from Arctic Permafrost Degradation.” Nature Climate Change 11 (10): 809–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01162-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01162-y

Naguib, M.M., R. Li, J. Ling, D. Grace, H. Nguyen-Viet, and J.F. Lindahl. 2021. “Live and Wet Markets: Food Access versus the Risk of Disease Emergence.” Trends in Microbiology 29 (7): 573–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2021.02.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2021.02.007

Pecher, D., and R.A. Zwaan, eds. 2005. Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499968

Prinz, J.J. 2009. “Are Emotions Feelings?”. Journal of Consciousness Studies 12, no. 8–10: 9–25.

Rehman, S., Dzionek-Kozłowska, J. 2018. “The Trolley Problem Revised. An exploratory study”. Annales. Ethics in Economics Life, vol 21, no 3, 23-32. https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.21.3.02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.21.3.02

Rizzolatti, G., and L. Craighero. 2005. “Mirror Neuron: A Neurological Approach to Empathy”. In: Neurobiology of Human Values, ed. J.-P. Changeux et al., 107–23. Berlin: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29803-7_9

Robbins P., and M. Aydede, eds. 2009. The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Scruton, R. 2000. “Animal Rights”. City Journal 10, no. 3. Accessed May 26, 2020. http://www.city-journal.org/html/animal-rights-11955.html.

Singer, P. 1975. Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals. New York: Harper Collins.

Thompson, E., and F.J. Varela. 2001. “Radical Embodiment: Neural Dynamics and Consciousness”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5, no. 10: 418–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01750-2

Thomson, J.J. 1976. “Killing, Letting Die, and The Trolley Problem”. The Monist 59, no. 2: 204–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/monist197659224

Vetulani, J. 2009. “Neurobiologia moralności” [Neurobiology of morality]. Wiedza i Życie, no. 4, 22–29.

Vetulani, J. 2010. “Neurobiologia dokonywania wyboru moralnego” [Neurobiology of making moral choices]. Filmed Jan. 13, 2010 at Tischner European University in Kraków. YouTube video, 2:07:19. Accessed May 29, 2020. www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-KWaampA6o.

Wohlleben, P. 2017. The Inner Life of Animals: Love, Grief, and Compassion—Surprising Observations of a Hidden World, trans. J. Billinghurst. Vancouver: Greystone Books.

Wolfe, C. 2009. What is Posthumanism. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.

Opublikowane

2023-05-31 — zaktualizowane 2024-11-18

Jak cytować

Jedynak, Anna. 2024. „Animal Rights: A New Vista”. Etyka 59 (1-2). Warsaw, Poland:103-21. https://doi.org/10.14394/etyka.1304.

Numer

Dział

Artykuły