What Is Pleasure? – Is Henry Sidgwick’s Definition Still Valid?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14394/etyka.477

Abstract

Hedonistic utilitarians claim that our moral duty is to maximize, impartially, the pleasure of as many beings as possible. But what is pleasure? Henry Sidgwick, the most careful writer of the classical utilitarians, defined it as “desirable consciousness”. The aim of this paper is, first, to elaborate on his definition and, second, to compare it with the recent neuroscientific findings on what happens in the brain when we experience pleasure. Is it necessarily a conscious feeling? Is desire common to all feelings that we call pleasure? Can we compare pleasures and pains? In the end, the discussion will lead us to pose a question about the methodology of using scientific studies in philosophical discussions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2014-12-01

How to Cite

Lazari-Radek, Katarzyna. 2014. “What Is Pleasure? – Is Henry Sidgwick’s Definition Still Valid?”. Etyka 49 (December). Warsaw, Poland:23-40. https://doi.org/10.14394/etyka.477.

Issue

Section

Papers

Most read articles by the same author(s)