What Is Pleasure? – Is Henry Sidgwick’s Definition Still Valid?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14394/etyka.477Abstract
Hedonistic utilitarians claim that our moral duty is to maximize, impartially, the pleasure of as many beings as possible. But what is pleasure? Henry Sidgwick, the most careful writer of the classical utilitarians, defined it as “desirable consciousness”. The aim of this paper is, first, to elaborate on his definition and, second, to compare it with the recent neuroscientific findings on what happens in the brain when we experience pleasure. Is it necessarily a conscious feeling? Is desire common to all feelings that we call pleasure? Can we compare pleasures and pains? In the end, the discussion will lead us to pose a question about the methodology of using scientific studies in philosophical discussions.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Works published in ETYKA are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0), which entails acknowledgement of authorship. Under this licence, Authors keep their copyrights and agree that their works can be used again legally for any purpose, including commercial ones, without the need to obtain previous consent of the Author or publisher. The articles can be downloaded, printed, copied and disseminated; under the condition that the authorship is indicated accordingly, together with the place of original publication. The Authors preserve their copyrights to the above-mentioned works without any limitation whatsoever.